Will "Parasitic Language Games: maintaining ambigui..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
Mini
5
Ṁ57Feb 1
30%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2023 Review resolves in February 2025.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Parasitic Language Games: maintaining ambiguity to hide conflict while burning the commons is one of the top fifty posts of the 2023 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
Get
1,000and
1.00
1,0001.00Related questions
Related questions
Will "Cohabitive Games so Far" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
55% chance
Will "Towards Monosemanticity: Decomposing Language..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
22% chance
Will "Towards Developmental Interpretability" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
69% chance
Will "Revealing Intentionality In Language Models T..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
24% chance
Will "Mapping the semantic void: Strange goings-on ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
19% chance
Will "A stylized dialogue on John Wentworth's claim..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
26% chance
Will "The Parable of the King and the Random Process" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
82% chance
Will "Preventing Language Models from hiding their ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "And All the Shoggoths Merely Players" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
38% chance
Will "Sapir-Whorf for Rationalists" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
16% chance