Dowker and Kent (1996) "On the Consistent Histories Approach to Quantum Mechanics"

Agmon and Spangler (2020) "A Multi-Scale Approach to Modeling E. coli Chemotaxis"

Beer & Williams (2015) “Information processing and dynamics in minimally cognitive agents”

Beer et al. (2024) "Deriving The Intrinsic Viability Constraint of an Emergent Individual from First Principles"

Tegmark (2000) “Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes”

Garola & Sozzo (2007) "The physical interpretation of partial traces: Two nonstandard views”

Maximilian Schlosshauer (2019) "Quantum Decoherence”

Jeknić-Dugić, Dugić & Francom (2014) “Quantum Structures of a Model-Universe: An Inconsistency with Everett Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics”

Kofler & Brukner (2006) “Classical world arising out of quantum physics under the restriction of coarse-grained measurements”

Inamori (2016) "No Quantum Process Can Explain the Existence of the Preferred Basis: Decoherence Is Not Universal”

Okon & Sudarsky (2016) “Less Decoherence and More Coherence in Quantum Gravity, Inflationary Cosmology and Elsewhere”

Fortin & Lombardi (2014) “Partial Traces in Decoherence and in Interpretation: What Do Reduced States Refer to?”

Crull (2017) "Yes, More Decoherence: A Reply to Critics"

Crull (2015) "Less Interpretation and More Decoherence in Quantum Gravity and Inflationary Cosmology"

Adler (2003) “Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: a response to P.W. Anderson”

Schlosshauer (2007) "Observations, the Quantum Brain, and Decoherence” (Chapter 9 from the book “Decoherence”)

Deutsch (1985) "Quantum theory as a universal physical theory”

Foster & Brown (1988) “On a recent attempt to define the interpretation basis in the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics”

Galvan (2010) “On the preferred-basis problem and its possible solutions”

Wallace (2002) "Worlds in the Everett interpretation"

Which of the papers will I find sufficiently good/awful such that I'll create a study note of it on 

? (There you can find past examples of papers that I find sufficiently good/awful.)

Related questions