Federal prosecutors have been saying the things they saw on CCTV footage from MAL was "alarming" and motivated the search warrant. (https://dnyuz.com/2022/08/16/f-b-i-interviewed-top-white-house-lawyers-about-missing-trump-documents/)
Resolves YES if the surveillance footage shows Trump had taken friends and/or guests of Mar-a-Lago into the room where the sensitive information was supposed to be securely stored. Resolves NO if we find out the alarming information discovered in the video as something other than Trump taking people into the supposedly secure room.
1,000
1.00@MartinRandall Supposedly secure room includes a restroom. Does it resolve YES if he let a visitor use it but did not go into the restroom with them?
@BTE what's your plan for resolution in the no-case? Like, nobody's gonna publish articles that say "the surveillance footage does not show trump taking friends/guests into the room". The question mentions "if we find out the alarming information discovered in the video as something other than Trump taking people into the supposedly secure room." but I think it's pretty easy to imagine a world where that also doesn't happen definitively and the video gets quietly brushed aside by both sides (e.g. if there's no illegal content in the video, but the contents of the video are politically damaging to trump, such that neither side has incentive to talk about it)
@Adam Kash Patel seems to have signaled publicly several weeks before the raid that he and Trump had all of the documents that were seized and were about to leak everything. So maybe some other people had a key...
@MartinRandall This is just a question of whether or not they have video evidence of Trump taking people into the room with no business being there.