With Elizondo soon testifying under oath before Congress, he'll finally have the chance to officially support his claims. If any of his statements are found to be false, this could open the door to potential perjury charges. This hearing could be a pivotal moment in assessing the credibility of his disclosures.

Relevant now

Selling my shares because this market takes too long to resolve

It's almost impossible to prosecute for perjury

The charges you mention couldn’t be proved in open court because it would require proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the things he is talking about don’t exist. He might get charged for violating his NDA though and that should be easy to prove. His claims are regularly verified indirectly at the highest levels such as the DNI and head of NASA.

@BTE It could be demonstrated that he didn't had access to information with the content he says he had.

@FranklinBaldo That isn't the same thing as knowing about it. Presumably he could have been told about something he didn't have access to.