Will an AI model be developed before 2030 that can accurately predict local weather patterns up to 6 months in advance?
➕
Plus
48
Ṁ11k
2029
5%
chance

From https://metaculus.com//questions/15536/6-month-ai-weather-forecasting/ Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning have led to significant improvements in many fields, [including weather forecasting](https://source.colostate.edu/ai-and-machine-learning-are-improving-weather-forecasts-but-they-wont-replace-human-experts/). Traditional weather forecasting models rely on complex simulations and data from numerous sources, such as satellites, weather stations, and ocean buoys. However, these models typically have [limited accuracy beyond a week or two](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_weather_prediction), making long-term predictions challenging; weather forecasts beyond 10 days are only right [half the time](https://scijinks.gov/forecast-reliability/#:~:text=A%20seven%2Dday%20forecast%20can,right%20about%20half%20the%20time.). As climate change continues to disrupt weather patterns, the need for more accurate and longer-term forecasts has become increasingly important for planning purposes and mitigating the adverse effects of extreme weather events. In recent years, AI techniques, such as deep learning, have shown [promising results](https://eos.org/research-spotlights/the-ai-forecaster-machine-learning-takes-on-weather-prediction) in enhancing short-term weather predictions. Given this potential, it is of great interest to determine whether AI can be utilized to significantly extend the time horizon for accurate weather forecasts. A breakthrough in long-term forecasting could transform industries like agriculture, renewable energy, and disaster management, helping society adapt to climate change more effectively. ***Will an AI model be developed before 2030 that can accurately predict local weather patterns up to 6 months in advance?*** This question will be considered resolved as **Yes** if, by December 31, 2029, a peer-reviewed study or an official announcement from a recognized meteorological organization confirms the development of an AI model that: 1. Predicts local weather patterns (e.g., temperature, precipitation) with a lead time of up to 6 months. 2. Achieves accuracy levels which surpass the [2022 state-of-the-art for seven-day forecasts](https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/html/hpcverif.shtml), defined as: - for precipitation, a "[threat score](https://www.e-education.psu.edu/meteo3/node/2285#:~:text=Threat%20scores%20indicate%20that%20the%20Weather%20Prediction%20Center%27s,less%20than%20half%20the%20area%20correct%2C%20on%20average.)" for 1-inch precipitation of at least [0.18](https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/images/hpcvrf/wpcd4710yr.gif), and; - for temperature, a [Mean Absolute Error](https://learningweather.psu.edu/node/77#:~:text=Mean%20Absolute%20Error,-Perhaps%20the%20simplest&text=So%2C%20if%20you%20forecast%20a,%3D%20%7C%2D3%C2%BAF%7C%20%3D%203%C2%BAF.) of no worse than [4 degrees Fahrenheit](https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/images/hpcvrf/d7minyr.gif) for the minimum temperature and [4.7 degrees Fahrenheit](https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/images/hpcvrf/d7maxyr.gif) for the maximum temperature. 3. Is tested on real-world data across diverse climate zones. If the AI model is a component of a larger AI system, the question resolves **Yes** as long as the above criteria are met.

Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S1.00
Sort by:

I left a more detailed comment on Metaculus, but to summarize: no, the atmosphere is far too chaotic for predictions that far out to be accurate, unless there's a literal Singularity.

I love the little spaceship in the bottom right of the photo.

@RobertCousineau even the AI knows we'd need aliens to be able to do this.

somewhat plausible

predicts YES

With an increasing global weather dataset, thanks to satellites etc, and with advancing expertise and compute power in ML, this is within the realm of possibility. Apply LLM-scale training to the climate and why not?

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2202.07575.pdf

predicts NO

@cloudprism I think it is not very plausible, because weather is chaotic system, very sensitive to initial conditions. If the behavior is not determined by the data available to us, it is not a problem of cleverly solving the problem, unique solution is simply not determined by the inputs known to us. (I might be considering YES if the time horizon was much shorter, say 1 month).

https://demonstrations.wolfram.com/SensitivityToInitialConditionsInChaos/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory

Completely absurd. YES is mentally ill here.