Announcement of capabilities counts, even if the API on release doesn't have it. Refers to the actual model, not to any tools packaged with it: GPT-4 does not have image output, despite ChatGPT supporting API calls to DALL-E 3.
Every option resolves NO if no model named GPT 4.5 is released by end of January.
Screenshot from a supposedly fake leak:
1,000
1.00🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ534 | |
| 2 | Ṁ379 | |
| 3 | Ṁ216 | |
| 4 | Ṁ162 | |
| 5 | Ṁ149 |
Why are these prices still above zero?
The "insiders" not only knew nothing, but they pretty much admitted by this point that they know nothing. So very probably all of these are going to resolve NO.
The address in the "supposedly fake" leak returns 404.
Of course an API can return anything it wants, but the norm would be to return 401 or 403 in those circumstances.
100% actually fake.
@DavidBolin I made this market to get better prices on some options(why is GPT 4.5 being released in December at 5% while image inputs here were 34%? Every option here should be strictly less than it being released at all, since they resolve NO not NA.)
But the average Manifolder has such poor reading comprehension that they all missed the free money and I didn't get a chance to buy "image output @ 2%" or something.
It might have worked if you had made these resolve NO if it doesn't come out by end of December, instead of end of January.
@DavidBolin I don't think so. People buying NO would be buying it because e.g. roon explicitly states "there is no GPT 4.5". So anyone with an investment thesis of "it's not coming out" should be buying NO regardless.
I don't want people arbitraging(because this takes liquidity when they buy YES on other markets), I want more NO bettors. So I have to make them not completely arbitragable.
@Mira You strongly implied that you knew for a fact that there is a GPT 4.5 and that it is coming out soon.
Assuming those things are true (and you were not just trying to get us to make bad bets), I would expect it to come out in January at the earliest, as I said before. That is precisely why I sold my NO bets here at a profit, while not selling the NO bets on the Christmas and EoY markets.
@Mira does it count as image output if it's calling text2im to make images with DALL-E as ChatGPT does currently? Or does this require image output somehow to be part of GPT-4 itself?
(Even if it's kind of just marketing to officially declare an image model to be part of GPT-4? Not really sure there is a principled way to draw lines between models other than how they're marketed)
@chrisjbillington The case of DALL-E is explicitly mentioned:
GPT-4 does not have image output, despite ChatGPT supporting API calls to DALL-E 3.
Supporting a modality means that modality is mapped to an embedding vector along with the text.
@chrisjbillington Just in case anyone else is confused, here are 3 more details:
It's acceptable for a modality to be mapped to multiple soft tokens(like image inputs are).
Video is not the same thing as multiple image inputs.
ChatGPT supports audio input and output, but GPT-4 doesn't because it simply reads/writes the text.
What is this?
What is Manifold?
Are our predictions accurate?
How do I win cash prizes?
and can't be cashed out. to participate and winners can withdraw sweepcash as a cash prize. You can filter for sweepstakes markets on the browse page.1.00Related questions
What is this?
What is Manifold?
Are our predictions accurate?
How do I win cash prizes?
and can't be cashed out. to participate and winners can withdraw sweepcash as a cash prize. You can filter for sweepstakes markets on the browse page.1.00