What will be JD Vance's future odds to be President one day -- as available on Jan 31st 2025?
💎
Premium
7
Ṁ14k
Feb 1
3%
JD Vance will have 90%+ odds or be President
3%
JD Vance will have odds below 9.9%
4%
JD Vance will have odds between 10.0% and 19.9%
5%
JD Vance will have odds between 20.0% and 29.9%
9%
JD Vance will have odds between 30.0 and 39.9%
17%
JD Vance will have odds between 40.0 and 49.9%
23%
JD Vance will have odds between 50.0 and 59.9%
21%
JD Vance will have odds between 60.0% and 69.9%
11%
JD Vance will have odds between 70.0% and 79.9%
4%
JD Vance will have odds between 80.0% and 89.9%

Let's look past Trump and Biden for a second. And Kamala.

JD Vance is likely to be the next Vice President of the United States. 60%+ according to the latest Polymarket odds, and many markets here.


Ever since LBJ, and removing obvious exceptions [Spiro Agnew, Dick Cheney] the rates at which young "normal" VPs have run successfully for president has been somewhere in the neighborhood of 50/50.

Vance will be 40 years old if he is inaugurated VP in January. He will have 30+ years to run for President after Trump retires, as Biden had from 1988 until finally being elected in 2020.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._D._Vance

What will be Vance's odds to become president one day? As of January 31st 2025.

Since this is a meta-market, resolution criteria will be difficult to know ahead of time.

I will pick the best market that we can find, in this priority order
1. Polymarket market with $100,000+ wagered
2. Manifold market with 100+ participants and 100,000+ Mana wagered

3. Other futures markets [we will pick the most robust]

Two other caveats.

Firstly, if we don't have a robust market that looks 10+ years into the future, but there is a good market for "Will JD Vance be President by 2030?" -- then we will use that and simply add 25% to the odds.

For example if the market for "Will JD Vance be President by 2030?" is at 50%... we will use 0.50 * 1.25 = 0.625 for our market.

[If his odds are 80% for 2030... we will use 85% for our market. Since we can only extend by 25% of the remaining 20%.]

Why 25%? No reason but 50% seemed too way too high and we are very likely to get a robust futures market for JD Vance at least for 2028 or 2032 if he is elected VP, and probably also if he is not. We would prefer to find a longer-looking market is possible. But if the best futures markets only look out 4-10 years, we will tack on 25%.

The second caveat is that we will try not to extend resolution past Jan 31st 2025 but we may have to. Remember that this is a meta-market about future markets.

Also if we have two or more very robust markets, we will average those odds. As we get closer to resolution, I will be clear about what markets are in play for resolution, and update this space.

https://deepnewz.com/us-elections/trump-announces-j-d-vance-running-mate-michigan-rally-after-assassination

Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S1.00
Sort by:

Firstly, if we don't have a robust market that looks 10+ years into the future, but there is a good market for "Will JD Vance be President by 2030?" -- then we will use that and simply add 25% to the odds.

this is pretty distortionary fwiw.

@Bayesian I guess so

But I expect we will have a good enough long range market…

@Bayesian do you suggest “by 2030” would be a better market?

@Moscow25 real money markets won't do that long term because the interest rate issues are terrible. maybe manifold will but the probability won't mean anything. i think metaculus would be fine for this and nothing else would be