How active will the 2024 Pacific hurricane season be?
➕
Plus
21
Ṁ5310
Jan 2
0.7%
Record low (22 < ACE)
21%
Below normal (22 < ACE < 80)
77%
Near-normal (80 < ACE < 115)
1.3%
Above normal (115 < ACE < 318)
0.3%
Record high (ACE > 318)

Activity is tracked in terms of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accumulated_cyclone_energy. This Wikipedia page has a list of previous North Pacific hurricane seasons by ACE.

If the value is 10 or more ACE away from one of the cutoff values, this market resolves in January 2025 to whatever value is listed on Wikipedia. If it is close to a cutoff, the market resolves after the reanalysis of all storms is completed (usually in April) to account for postseason adjustments in ACE.

The last ten years had the following activity:
Below normal: 2020
Near normal: 2017, 2019, 2021
Above normal: 2014, 2015, 2016, 2022, 2023
Record high: 2018

The least active season in recorded history was 1977, while the most active season was 2018.

See also my El Nino / La Nina market for hurricane season: https://manifold.markets/SaviorofPlant/will-it-be-el-nino-la-nina-or-neith. La Niña tends to suppress Pacific tropical cyclone activity, while El Niño tends to enhance it.

Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S1.00
Sort by:

Is this... Western Pacific ACE or Eastern Pacific ACE? What is "North Pacific"? The combined value?

@benshindel Because currently the "North Pacific" ACE is already like 160 or something, so this market doesn't make sense to me

@benshindel Western Pacific is typhoon not hurricane.

@ChristopherRandles okay but what is “North Pacific hurricane season” lol

@benshindel I apologize, "North Pacific Hurricane" was not the correct way to describe this market as South Pacific tropical cyclones are not called hurricanes. I was trying to clarify that South Pacific activity did not count. This market tracks Eastern Pacific ACE only (Western Pacific storms are called typhoons and not hurricanes). Sorry for any misunderstanding

@SaviorofPlant gotcha, no worries!

bought Ṁ100 Above normal (115 < ... NO

record high is >318 not <318 as written right?