By EOY 2034, what unexpected views of math will be changed by (superhuman) AI?
Mini
13
Ṁ518
2035
61%
At least one of the six left Millennium problems is found with a counter-example
43%
At least one of the six left Millennium problems is undecidable
36%
A unified framework for gravitation and quantum theory is proposed that is not string theory
25%
Neural Networks are explainable and can be trained without gradient descent with better performance.
25%
No AI will be powerful enough to directly (as a necessary condition) lead to a significant discovery in math.
17%
Shinichi Mochizuki is right or almost right about abc conjecture
13%
P vs. NP will be trivial (i.e., provable using simple methods taught in undergrad classes, e.g., with a counter-example)

I keep the right to NA any question.

If any of the options were solved by human before superhuman math AI appear, it will resolve to NA

#Math
#️ AI Alignment
#AI risk
#Artificial Intelligence
Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S1.00
6 Comments
Sort by:

A unified framework for gravitation and quantum theory is proposed that is not string theory

I'm pretty sure this is already happening every other week

bought Ṁ25 At least one of the ... NO

I'm also confused about happens if there's no superintelligent AI. Would those resolve "No" or N/A or what?

What if there is no superintelligent AI by EOY 2034?

@nathanwei We will have at least math-proof helpers; they might give new incentives.

@Sss19971997 Perhaps. But how would this resolve if there is no superhuman AI? The question pre-supposed superhuman AI.

@nathanwei i think i might add an answer that says, there will not be an superhuman AI

Related questions

Terms & Conditions•Privacy Policy•Sweepstakes Rules