On release, which of these prompts will OpenAI's Sora follow without obvious flaws?

Plus

Ṁ3035

Jan 1

ALL

65%

A 360 degree pan around a Sumerian tablet depicting elephants in a well-lit museum display.

57%

A gentleman with a cane on a walk, passing behind a large sequoia tree.

54%

An astronaut carrying a horse on his shoulders, walking through a meadow.

52%

A 360 degree pan around an intricately-carved jade elephant in a well-lit museum display.

49%

A gentleman with a cane on a walk, passing behind a very thin birch tree.

35%

A goat skull bouncing like a rubber ball in an empty white room.

26%

A hot pink six sided dice with blue pips, rotating 360 degrees in outer space.

23%

A horse riding on an astronaut's shoulders in a meadow.

18%

A 360 degree pan around a Sumerian tablet in a well-lit museum display. The front depicts bearded dwarves fighting elephants, while the back depicts wedges of Swiss cheese.

14%

A six-legged goat running and jumping in an alpine meadow.

13%

A horse riding an astronaut in a meadow.

1.3%

Beautiful video of 15 different moth species flapping their wings, professional photography, 8k, trending on Twitter

Judgment here is necessarily subjective. I will ignore small anomalies, but clear discrepancies from how reality works will get a "no". Technically believable images that violate the prompt will also fail: for instance, a video of a man walking behind a large tree and a differently-dressed man emerging will fail if the prompt was "a man on a walk, passing behind a sequoia". Likewise, the famous "horse riding an astronaut" prompt must properly depict the horse atop the astronaut.

Prompt-engineered versions of these prompts will not be considered a "pass"; these easily human-interpreted prompts must succeed without the AI being given any special assistance.

If I do not have access to Sora before end of year, or the price for said access does not go below $250 before end of year, all options will resolve N/A.

Get

1,000

and

1.00

7 Comments

Sort by:

Does it need to be exactly 15 different butterflies?

@henry_ The prompt said 15, so yep.

A hot pink six sided dice with blue pips, rotating 360 degrees in outer space.

I suspect most frames will look ok, but the number of pipe will be obviously wrong as it rotates, like duplicate sides, or a side changing after it's rotated around the back.

Do clear discrepancies from how reality works but that are barely noticeable count?
Eg if a tree that's in the distant background of the video and thus very small and intentionally out of focus fades out of existence; i.e. such that you would never notice it when watching normally but also such that if you're looking for it it does clearly violate reality, would that count?

@Nat I'm not going to be going over the videos with a fine tooth comb; each of these represents a particular possible "point of failure". So if small things like that happen, but the core of the video works, it'll resolve "yes".

How strict is this? If the tree is an evergreen but clearly not a sequoia, will that count? Does the die need to have all 6 sides correct in location (i.e. 6 opposite 1, 2 opposite 5 etc?)

@Weepinbell

The die should not repeat pips until it gets back to the "start", which should be the same, but it's fine if it's not perfectly arranged. The tree doesn't have to exactly be a sequoia (though I doubt that will be an issue), just a suitably thick tree that someone can walk behind and come out the other side.

Related questions

Related questions