By March 2026, will 3+ prominent US politicians advocate for banning open-weight AI models?
➕
Plus
42
Ṁ7790
2026
59%
chance

To qualify as a "prominent US politician" for the purposes of this market, a person must:

  • EITHER hold or have held one of the following offices:

    • President

    • Vice President

    • US Senator

    • US Representative

    • US Governor

  • OR be nominated or have been nominated by the Democrat or Republican parties as candidates for one of the following offices:

    • President

    • Vice President

To qualify as "advocat[ing] for banning open-weight AI models" for the purposes of this market, there must be a statement that:

  1. Is directly attributable to the politician in question

  2. Is public, such as in a speech, interview, or social media post

  3. Explicitly calls out "open-weight models", "open-source AI", or some close equivalent

  4. Clearly indicates a desire to ban open-weight models, not just regulate them. Such an indication might involve phrases like:

    • "Ban"

    • "Prohibit"

    • "Shut down"

    • "Make illegal"

  5. Advocates for the ban as a policy position, not merely as a hypothetical

  6. Was made between September 20, 2024 and March 31, 2026.

I will resolve to YES if, before the end of March 2026, there are 3 separate qualifying individuals who have made qualifying statements, documented on this market. I will resolve to NO at the close of the market otherwise.


Question inspired by these posts:

https://x.com/harris_edouard/status/1837144375337300441

https://x.com/harris_edouard/status/1837144376956354634

Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S1.00
Sort by:

Does such a call for models beyond a certain compute or capability threshold count?

@CalebW seconded. This needs to be operationalized. Unless we're expecting people to call for AlexNet to be banned.

@CalebW @JBreos The spirit of the question is meant to cover broad calls for outlawing open-source advanced AI, like future Llama releases. If the politician said “no more releasing weights at GPT-4 levels of compute and above”, I would think that should count. If they just ask for some narrow restriction, like that AI projects need to be closed-source to be eligible for military funding, I would think that should not count. They don’t need to call for AlexNet to be banned. I’m open to suggested operationalizations to pin this down.

N.B. I was hoping the account that wrote the Tweets inspiring this market would clarify what they meant by a ban, but I haven’t gotten a response from them yet. https://x.com/cfgeek/status/1837206459391824125?s=46