Some possible triggers for NO:
He resigns or otherwise loses the presidency before the war ends
He dies before the war ends
He is ousted from the presidency as a condition of the war ending (even if he is given a small transition period of less than a year)
Russia ceases to exist as a nation
He changes position or title to something other than "President"
Doesn't trigger a resolution:
The war extends beyond Ukraine and is no longer considered the Ukraine-Russia war
Ukraine ceases to exist as a nation, is annexed, or is renamed
Russia is renamed
Otherwise, YES when the war ends. As per questions in the comments: for practical reasons, a formal armistice that is adhered to would qualify as the end of the war.
The close date on this market may be extended as needed.
1,000
1.00@Lorelai both are true! in this case, the invasion might end (e.g. by annexation) but the war could extend beyond there, thus the phrasing
@Stralor annexation is still invasion because the territory is still Ukrainian – that's why Ukrainians refer to "temporarily occupied territories". I'm not saying you're not correct – the war is geographically located in Ukraine, but phrasing it this way ensures Russia correctly receives the blame for it 🙂
Nvm you passed the interview for senior QA.
@Stralor How do you define "war ends"? Does an armistice suffice, or does it have to be a permanent peace settlement observed by both sides?
@PS an armistice that is held to would suffice imo. I'd probably resolve when both armistice and actual cessation of conflict occur, with the caveat of reopening if it doesn't hold. thanks for the question!
Is there possibility for N/A in this market? Is it "does not trigger resolution"? To me N/A is one of resolution results.
@KongoLandwalker N/A is always a possibility if not stated imo. I can't think of any natural reasons that would resolve it in this case, though, only unforeseen problems
@KongoLandwalker This will likely resolve NO when/if he resigns, but if he returns as president in time I'll ask for a re-resolve.