I'm neither a mod nor a partner. I'm a normal (verified) user living in the US.
Counts as YES if the spirit of Sweepcash lives on, under a different name or mechanism, and user-generated questions are allowed.
Counts as YES even if a question needs to be vetted by the team (however slow/fast the process is.)
Counts as NO if users can suggest questions, but the question is not directly tied to the user once it opens for trading. For example, if an official account posts the question a la Kalshi. (sans profit sharing)
1,000
1.00I think by my reading of the question this should resolve yes, although it's not very clear.
Counts as YES even if a question needs to be vetted by the team (however slow/fast the process is.)
The team selects specific markets to sweepify
Counts as NO if users can suggest questions, but the question is not directly tied to the user once it opens for trading. For example, if an official account posts the question a la Kalshi. (sans profit sharing)
The question is still tied to the original user who is shown as the creator.
@jgyou It's very unlikely users would ever be able to create a sweepcash market directly, but we're thinking about creating a streamlined flow for user requests to sweepify their markets...
@SG Makes sense. I updated the description while you were betting btw. Happy to reimburse you if the clarification changes your odds.
@jgyou would my proposal of a hyper-streamlined approval process make this market resolve yes? the terms seem even more ambiguous now.