@traders I created few experimental questions here on Manifold that attempt to replicate the functionality of my platform. You can check them out here:

It’s like wikihow with the prediction market swapped in in place of the wiki

@mariopasquato Yeah kinda. My platform would be more focused on optimization and also reward good contributions dynamically based on their actual expected value. On wikihow you basically get one random approach that seems good, and may have worked for someone, and there aren't that strong incentives to optimize it further.

Here anyone can just come, submit an insightful approach to an already existing problem and get immediately rewarded for it.

@patrik Are you planning to make your own prediction market platform or to use manifold? Do you think you could automate translating your couple (question, metric) into a new market to be posted on manifold?

@mariopasquato I already have a functional platform with betting and everything.

I guess there is a way. Maybe multiple option questions where everyone has to denormalize the probability in their head into appropriate range and each option could just be referring to a comment since I don't think you can write enough text there.

I'd also have to distribute rewards somehow manually.

But maybe I could somehow interconnect my platform with manifold, such that when someone creates approach on Approdict it creates an option with a comment here on Manifold.

Maybe you could save a lot of time building out potentially wrong features by instead running a prototype on top of Manifold? You'll have a baked in audience (with the needed network effects), and you would learn a ton about what your potential users would be looking for, so you can be much more confident that you're building something people want.

I definitely think there is a product for Personal Goals <> Prediction Markets, and have built a bit in the space, so I'm happy to share more thoughts if you're curious.

You'll learn a ton working on anything, so it's hard to discourage anyone from working on anything without comparing it to the other ideas they're excited about. But as you're probably a fairly technical minded person, my guess is the best learning will come not from building a product but from trying to grow something that's useful to a lot of people (which might require less building than you think).

From firsthand experience:
"First time founders are obsessed with product, second time founders are obsessed with distribution."

If you can get yourself to start thinking more like a second time founder, you can save a ton of time!

Good luck!

@Charlie Thanks! And that's actually not a bad idea.

Abstracting away the part where you have to set up and check the markets sounds attractive. One issue would be making sure the question and metric are actually good. At the beginning you can do this by hand.

@CraigDemel It's also about rewarding the best approaches based on dynamic problem demand.